[sc-users] Updating single - only a group of internal Ugens
Batuhan Bozkurt
batuhan at batuhanbozkurt.com
Wed Apr 9 08:19:44 PDT 2008
Yeah, I've updated the extra plugins before but was not sure if the
ones bundled with SC are linked inbetween them in some way or another.
So thanks!
BB
Josh Parmenter wrote:
> Nope... that should be fine. The nice thing about the plugin
> architecture is that you CAN do just this sort of thing for UGens!
>
> Best,
>
> Josh
>
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:57 AM, Batuhan Bozkurt wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I never poked around with the internal file structure of SC before
>> so a
>> noobish question but here it goes:
>> A bug of the Pluck Ugen present in SC3.2 is fixed in a recent
>> svn(thanks
>> Joshua!). Since I'm fairly happy with my build right now, I want to
>> update Pluck. What I did was: I downloaded the recent snapshot binary,
>> got the DelayUGens.scx and replaced it with the one in official 3.2
>> build. Then updated the class file just in case. It seems to work fine
>> now, this would not break anything right?
>>
>> Thanks
>> BB
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc-users mailing list
>> sc-users at create.ucsb.edu
>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
>>
>
> ******************************************
> /* Joshua D. Parmenter
> http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
>
> “Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own
> interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively
> or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this
> regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual
> renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social
> palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
> */
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
> sc-users at create.ucsb.edu
> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
>
>
More information about the sc-users
mailing list