[sc-users] In.ar consecutive busses

[James Harkins]

What iteration, exactly?

In.ar(8, 3) gives you [ an OutputProxy, an OutputProxy, an OutputProxy ]

In.ar([8, 10, 12], 1) gives you [ an OutputProxy, an OutputProxy, an  
OutputProxy ]

The only difference is that the OutputProxies for In.ar(8, 3) feed  
off of the same In.ar. In the second case, there are three In's...  
but this is essentially hidden from the user. You can use both in the  
same way in your synthdef.

Where it gets interesting is In.ar([8, 10, 12], 2) --> [ [ an  
OutputProxy, an OutputProxy ], [ an OutputProxy, an OutputProxy ],  
[ an OutputProxy, an OutputProxy ] ]  ... but this is easily solved  
by .flat

I think a problem is being made here where no problem actually exists.
hjh

On Mar 2, 2007, at 8:07 AM, scott micheli-smith wrote:

>> That In.ar multichannel expands to multiple In ugens. But why should
>> anyone care? In is relatively cheap.
>
> i thought it was quite nice to make N channel mixers and things
> without iteration


: H. James Harkins
: jamshark70 at dewdrop-world.net
: http://www.dewdrop-world.net
.::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.create.ucsb.edu/pipermail/sc-users/attachments/20070302/ebe9d9f1/attachment.htm