[sc-users] [panther]no such file or directory, sclang @ emacs

[blackrain]

On 12/23/06, BUYO-BUYO-IGOR <buyobuyo at db3.so-net.ne.jp> wrote:
> thank YOU blackrain for keeping gcc3-ppl alive
>

lots of ppl are forced to use older systems. be it for audio cards
drivers or simply cause of the machine's hardware not performing that
well with the new systems.
glad it works for you too =)

> i used to read japanese emails on carbon-emacs
> but after having to re-install the osx
> made up my mind to use pre-installed things as much as possible
> and wondered if emacs at terminal could work for sclang
> it seems like emacs itself launched
> cuz i had to c-x c-c to return to the command-line
>

yes, thats how it works.

> oh and when i just did ./sclang
> it told me that it couldn't do something with emacs
> but launched anyway

this is because part of the library that is bundled with that build
comes originally from the linux package. it adds methods that relay on
emacs.

> am a vi user
> so if i could ignore that emacs related message
> would go to that direction
> am i stupid?
>

no, not at all.
thats how it works.
yes, you can ignore the emacs warning.
you are in the right direction.

> and yes
> if carbon-emacs only helps
> will be greedy wanting to download it too
> carbon version also works in the terminal...right?
> then i can still do sc thangs over there
>

hmm no. carbon builds run in the gui (out of the term) as native mac
os x apps do.
carbon means its based on the carbon api for mac os x.

> maybe people would tell me to
> learn how to compile it by myself
> if insisting to be vi oriented?
>

there is something out there exactly like you want - sc in vi.
search the list and swiki.
but first you have to get sclang booting fine on the term - which from
your msg, its already working.

cheers,

x



> On Dec 24, 2006, at 6:16 AM, blackrain wrote:
>
> > glad you got a new (and updated) sc build for your machine.
> >
> > the error you are getting when trying the emacs version, is telling
> > you that your machine does not have emacs installed.
> >
> > I have an emacs 21.3.50.1 its really kewl. carbon and all.
> > that should work for the problem you are describing now.
> > however the uncompressed  footprint for the app in HD is 102 MB.
> > I dont know how big it would end up being in a compressed disk image.
> > the package used to be online (at a site that offers emacs builds for
> > carbon. dont remember it from the top of my head would have to look)
> > but was taken off eventually for being too old so I think our only bet
> > is to get this one posted to the RealizedSound sf site as well.
> > might do this soon if there is interest in it.
> > let me know.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
> sc-users at create.ucsb.edu
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
>