[OSC_dev] Good C++ libraries ?

[Xavier Miller]

In fact, the EasyOsc licence is too vague, it is not explicitely GPL,
nor LGPL but "GPL-like" and I cannot use it without legal problem.

And technically, I prefer OSCpack which is easier to use, without
defining a lot of callback functions.

Xavier.

Damian Stewart a écrit :
> Jeff Glatt wrote:
>> You can link to GPL'ed dynamic/shared libraries from commercial
>> software without needing to release your commercial source, for
>> example how you typically link to Linux's GNU-based C lib. What
>> you can't do is modify the library source itself, and re-release it
>> binary-only.
> 
> no - you can do this if the dynamic/shared library is LGPL (Lesser GPL or 
> 'Library' GPL), but if the dynamic/shared library is pure GPL, your 
> application that links to it needs to be pure GPL as well.
>