[OSC_dev] Good C++ libraries ?

[Gaspard Bucher]

I am using 1.0.2.

The only thing that annoys me with OSCpack is that it extensively uses
the Implementation pattern which I find a stupid choice for a fast
library that is not meant to change that much.

Gaspard

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Xavier Miller <xavier.miller at cauwe.org> wrote:
> I checked the SVN version, which is OK. I will take it.
>
> Xavier.
>
> Xavier Miller a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Which version do you use ?
>>
>> Xavier.
>>
>> Gaspard Bucher a écrit :
>>> I have no issue with OSCpack. It's a mature library.
>>>
>>> Maybe you should just send a mail to the author so you can fix the
>>> issue you are facing ?
>>>
>>> Gaspard
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Xavier Miller <xavier.miller at cauwe.org> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I tried OSCpack, which is the recommended C++ library by
>>>> opensoundcontrol.org
>>>>
>>>> But, the code of the version 1.0.2 doesn't compile and I needed to add
>>>> necessary #include in the source.
>>>> And I also needed to write a makefile, split the source and the headers
>>>> in order to have something more "professional".
>>>>
>>>> Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of
>>>> the box"?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Xavier Miller.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSC_dev mailing list
>>>> OSC_dev at create.ucsb.edu
>>>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSC_dev mailing list
>>> OSC_dev at create.ucsb.edu
>>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSC_dev mailing list
>> OSC_dev at create.ucsb.edu
>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev
> _______________________________________________
> OSC_dev mailing list
> OSC_dev at create.ucsb.edu
> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev
>