[OSC_dev] SYNoscopy (or something like it)

[werteplus at gmail.com]

well, the synoscopy board isn't really active, i just uploaded the whole
synoscopy thing to this site some months ago to make it findable and not get
completely rotten.

i wanted to build a hardware adapter with a microcontroller which translates
between midi and synoscopy to oscenable old equipment, but i never got to
it.

you're completely welcome to do any changes for your needs (as there are no
implementations i know of anyway), i guess here would be a good place to
discuss these things. and i'm definately interested in how you use it!

greetings,
fabb



Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:08:31 -0500
> From: "Jeff Glatt" <jgglatt at roadrunner.com>
> Subject: [OSC_dev] SYNoscopy (or something like it)
> To: <osc_dev at create.ucsb.edu>
> Message-ID: <5C8268FDC3CB4D62828088005EADAB62 at jeffdesktop>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I'm planning on writing a developer library that implements some sort
> of OSC-based "standard" that replaces MIDI. As someone previously
> mentioned, you currently can't use OSC for anything but a proprietary
> protocol because there are no standardized set of messages (like
> MIDI's Note-On, Note-Off, Program Change, Controller, etc, messages).
>
> So, I was taking a look at this SYNoscopy specification (because what
> I'd need to do is what this specification proposes). First of all, is
> there any device/software currently implementing/using this particular
> spec? Secondly, since there are aspects of the spec that I think could
> be changed for the better (ie, make it easier, and more efficient, to
> actually implement in software), I'm wondering where is the best place
> to discuss them. There is a message board on the SYNoscopy site, but
> it has only 1 message that looks to be dating back to 2007. Is that
> board active? There looks to be some other site where people leave
> comments, but the formatting makes it very difficult to follow, and
> without any reply threading, it's really hard to determine who is
> commenting on what.
>
> Is this list better for discussing a full OSC replacement for MIDI?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/pipermail/osc_dev/attachments/20090127/20c24ed8/attachment.html