[OSC_dev] Managing different osc implementations

[Damian Stewart]

Mr.SpOOn wrote:

> Does exist something similar?
> And what is the real problem? That every application (SuperCollider,
> ChucK, PureData etc.) that uses osc implements it in a different way?

every application that uses OSC implements the protocol in the same way. i 
don't know about ChucK or SuperCollider, but with Pd you have to define 
your own naming system that runs over OSC anyway. for example, if you want 
to control the cutoff for a lowpass filter on a 303 emulator, then you 
decide that the message would be something like /303emu/lowpass/cutoff 
<value> , then in Pd you just listen for that message. same in 
SuperCollider, same in ChucK.

d

-- 
damian stewart | skype: damiansnz | damian at frey.co.nz
frey | live art with machines | http://www.frey.co.nz