[OSC_dev] Fwd: Application Profiles: oscplanet
Gaspard Bucher
gaspard at teti.ch
Tue Dec 23 08:41:36 PST 2008
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:59 PM, <salsaman at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, December 23, 2008 15:43, Gaspard Bucher wrote:
>> There are actually 3+1 levels in this problem, 3 are related to data
>> exchange and 1 is related to the physical layer (connection):
>>
>> 0. if UDP: network connection ===> solved through a common dns-sd
>> service name (zeroconf): "xxxxxx" name (see below)
>> 1. data format ===> solved through OSC
>> 2. query / get /set ===> solved through a common ground: "xxxxxxx"
>> conventions / methods
>> 3. application functionalities ===> naming conventions for certain
>> kinds of applications, midi equivalents, etc ===> "OpenMediaControl"
>> for example
>>
>> About the "oscplanet" name, I prefer names that are somehow linked to
>> metaphors ("Bonjour", "zeroconf", "Safari") but I do not really care.
>> It seems to make sense to include something in the name about the
>> distributed nature of the protocol, since the name refers to the full
>> stack above and not only the query system conventions. Propositions
>> (Only lower-case letters, digits, and hyphens; must begin and end with
>> lower-case letter or digit) :
>>
>> "oscnet" (this sounds a bit too much like .NET to me, but it's easy to
>> pronounce and is meaningful)
>> "oscit" (Open Sound Control it, fun)
>> "oscsqp" (Open Soundc Control Server Query Protocol, cryptic)
>> "oscplanet" (seems too related to rubyk metaphors)
>> "openmediacontrol" (illegal = too long)
>> "omc" (french acronym for WTO: please no)
>>
>> My prefered name is "oscit" (fun, sounds good and highlights the
>> *control* part of the thing) with second being "oscnet" (more focus on
>> the network, distributed part).
>>
>> Please feel free to give your view on the names above (or propose new
>> ones).
>>
>> Gaspard
>>
>
> I am sorry, I seem to have missed what you are registering for.
The low level network/query thing (http://rubyk.org/en/article162.html).
>
> However, I would like to propose "osculate", it seems to fit nicely with
> what we are attempting:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osculate
osculate is fun !
I am not a good enough english speaker to say anything about the
connotations of the word though. But I do like the meaning. If this
low level feature makes it to mass market would a sticker with
"osculate ready !" be ok ? I have the feeling that it would be a
little weird..
Gaspard
>
> Certainly a libosculate would be an interesting concept.
>
> Gabriel.
> http://lives.sourceforge.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSC_dev mailing list
> OSC_dev at create.ucsb.edu
> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev
>
More information about the OSC_dev
mailing list