[OSC_dev] No dumpOSC output in pipe in non-interactive terminal
Andy W. Schmeder
andy at cnmat.berkeley.edu
Sun Sep 9 14:17:40 PDT 2007
There seems to be some confusion here. The liblo-devel thread you
referenced earlier appears to discuss an experimental high-level
feature that implements a scheduler for liblo. Its been a while
since I actually coded with liblo, but if you check the docs, the
time-tag is available as a pair of uint_32 in the lo_timetag struct.
You should have no problem sending a stream of time-tagged bundles
using that.
Most implementations provide the timetag in a more or less equivalent
format. As for the time stamps themselves, they can be generated off
of gettimeofday() or however you see fit.
On Sep 9, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Torsten Anders wrote:
> thanks for your reply. It appears we misunderstood each other. I
> don't want realtime scheduling to be part of the library (nor my
> application for that matter) exactly because of these complexities.
> Instead, I want an application designed to care about timing (like
> Ps or SuperCollider) receive OSC and then care about the scheduling
> of the events it received.
>
> Therefore, I assumed, I need an OSC library which can send
> timestamped bundles (i.e. can generate the NTP timestamps, but does
> not do the scheduling itself). Its seems some OSC libraries (e.g.,
> Pd's orig [dumpOSC] and liblo -- according to its TODO file) can
> not encode/decode these time tags.
...
---
Andy W. Schmeder
andy [at] cnmat.berkeley.edu
phone: +1-510-643-9990 x.313
cell: +1-510-717-6653
Programmer/Analyst II
Center for New Music and Audio Technologies
University of California at Berkeley
http://cnmat.berkeley.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.create.ucsb.edu/pipermail/osc_dev/attachments/20070909/c347a83a/attachment.htm
More information about the OSC_dev
mailing list